linux-kernel - Re: [1/2] mm: lock a vma before stack expansion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpEX8tXMKd7BKu7JOxhSfgeVnaerJ2db6PqfrScG5cUwig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jul 2023 23:18:11 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <tatashin@...gle.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [1/2] mm: lock a vma before stack expansion

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 10:55 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> …
> >> Markus, your nitpicking is not useful.  Please stop.
> >
> > I'll fix the nits, at least the ones I can, if there is a need for v2.
>
> Thanks for such a constructive feedback.
>
> Would you like to take any further information better into account
> for subsequent patch variants?

All feedback is appreciated. The comments you provided so far seem to
be nice-to-haves but not critical enough to post a new version of the
patch IMHO. If something more substantial is found that requires a new
version then I'll address your feedback there as well.
Thanks,
Suren.

>
> Regards,
> Markus