linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: light: bd27008: Support BD27010 RGB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230708172116.42220c23@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sat, 8 Jul 2023 17:21:16 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: light: bd27008: Support BD27010 RGB

One trivial request for a comment.

Otherwise (subject to jetlag - which snuck up on me during this review)
this looks fine to me..
Will be a few weeks though until the precursor series does the
round trip via upstream to get into the branch I'd want to apply this
on.

Jonathan


>  
> +static int bu27010_get_gain_sel(struct bu27008_data *data, int *sel)
> +{
> +	int ret, tmp;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We always "lock" the gain selectors for all channels to prevent
> +	 * unsupported configs. It does not matter which channel is used
> +	 * we can just return selector from any of them.
> +	 */
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, BU27008_REG_MODE_CONTROL2, sel);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*sel = FIELD_GET(BU27010_MASK_DATA0_GAIN, *sel);
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, BU27008_REG_MODE_CONTROL1, &tmp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*sel |= FIELD_GET(BU27010_MASK_RGBC_GAIN, tmp) << fls(BU27010_MASK_DATA0_GAIN);

Odd enough to perhaps warrant a comment on the maths.

> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +