lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <63EDE3B6-B0AD-4D67-8EC6-FC8AE627E352@linux.dev>
Date:   Sat, 8 Jul 2023 09:42:57 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: fix a race between vmemmap pmd split



> On Jul 8, 2023, at 03:38, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri,  7 Jul 2023 11:38:59 +0800 Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
> 
>> The local variable @page in __split_vmemmap_huge_pmd() to obtain a pmd
>> page without holding page_table_lock may possiblely get the page table
>> page instead of a huge pmd page.  The effect may be in set_pte_at()
>> since we may pass an invalid page struct, if set_pte_at() wants to
>> access the page struct (e.g. CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK is enabled), it
>> may crash the kernel.  So fix it. And inline __split_vmemmap_huge_pmd()
>> since it only has one user.
> 
> Is this likely enough to justify a backport?
> 
> I'm thinking "add cc:stable and merge into 6.6-rc1", so it hits -stable
> after a couple of months of testing.
> 

Hi Andrew,

It is better to backport it to stable. Could you help me add it?

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ