[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <935c14fd-e87f-e89b-f641-7fb529bc7e50@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:17:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, quic_collinsd@...cinc.com,
quic_kamalw@...cinc.com, quic_jestar@...cinc.com,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] iio: adc: Update bindings for ADC7 name used on
QCOM PMICs
On 08/07/2023 09:28, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> The name used initially for this version of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
> PMIC ADC was ADC7, following the convention of calling the PMIC generation
> PMIC7. However, the names were later amended internally to ADC5 Gen2 and
> PMIC5 Gen2. In addition, the latest PMIC generation now is known as
> PMIC5 Gen3 with ADC5 Gen3 supported on it. With this addition, it makes more
> sense to correct the name for this version of ADCs to ADC5 Gen2 from ADC7.
> Since this affects ADC devices across some PMICs, update the names accordingly.
>
> In order to avoid breaking the existing implementations of ADC7, add
> support for ADC5 Gen2 first now and remove the ADC7 support in a later
> patch.
I don't understand and I do not see it explained, why do you remove
ADC7. The patch is also doing way too many things at the same time...
>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 21 +++--
> .../bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.yaml | 16 ++--
> .../iio/qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2-pm8350.h | 64 +++++++++++++
> .../iio/qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2-pm8350b.h | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../iio/qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2-pmk8350.h | 47 ++++++++++
> .../iio/qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2-pmr735a.h | 29 ++++++
> .../iio/qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2-pmr735b.h | 28 ++++++
> include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++
Bindings are always separate patches. If this is commit for bindings, then:
Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists