linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] proc: proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230709172753.GA22287@1wt.eu>
Date:   Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:27:53 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
Cc:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] proc: proc_setattr for /proc/$PID/net

Hi Thomas,

On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 07:10:58PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi Willy,
> 
> On 2023-07-09 11:29:47+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:06:09PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> >> [..]
> > 
> > Now queued, thanks!
> > Willy
> 
> Don't we need an Ack from the fs maintainers for the patch to
> fs/proc/proc_net.c ?
> 
> Personally I expected this series to go in via the fs tree because of
> that patch.

Gasp! You're totally right, I confused it with a test only changing
the nolibc-test file, as the chmod_net test appeared as a dependency!
Let me drop it from the series and push again.

Thanks a lot for notifying me!
Willy