linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.3 000/431] 6.3.13-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEUSe7_dcPNEMqCbd6r+f_zJypQ196MSxigq6i+5eSh3=vvDOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 9 Jul 2023 14:06:05 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.3 000/431] 6.3.13-rc1 review

Hello!

On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 05:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> ------------------
> Note, this is the LAST release for the 6.3.y kernel series.  After this
> is released, it will be end-of-life.  Please move to the 6.4.y kernel
> series at this point in time, OR let us know what is preventing that
> from happening for you.
> ------------------
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.3.13 release.
> There are 431 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:14:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.3.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.3.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

There build regressions on Arm 32-bits, specifically omap1_defconfig:

-----8<-----
  /builds/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c: In function 'omap1_init_irq':
  /builds/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:221:11: error: implicit
declaration of function 'irq_domain_add_legacy'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    domain = irq_domain_add_legacy(NULL, nr_irqs, irq_base, 0,
             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  /builds/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:222:13: error:
'irq_domain_simple_ops' undeclared (first use in this function); did
you mean 'irq_domain_chip_generic'?
              &irq_domain_simple_ops, NULL);
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               irq_domain_chip_generic
  /builds/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:222:13: note: each
undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
appears in
  /builds/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:250:23: error: implicit
declaration of function 'irq_find_mapping'; did you mean
'iomem_get_mapping'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_find_mapping(domain, omap_l2_irq));
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         iomem_get_mapping
  cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
  make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:252:
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.o] Error 1
----->8-----

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org