linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230709094154.GI9321@1wt.eu>
Date:   Sun, 9 Jul 2023 11:41:54 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel
 config

Hi Zhangjin,

On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 02:21:20AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> This patchset assumes the chmod_net removal patchset will be applied at
> first, if not, the chmod_argv0 added alphabetically will not be applied.
> Since our new chmod_argv0 is exactly added to replace chmod_net, so,
> Willy, is it ok for you to at least apply the chmod_net removal patch
> [5] before this patchset?

Sure, and thanks for the reminder, I had missed it in the middle of
the flood.

(...)
>     LOG: testing summary:
> 
>           arch/board | result
>          ------------|------------
>      arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.
>            x86_64/pc | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.
>         mipsel/malta | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.
>     loongarch64/virt | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.

Great, I like this, thank you! That was precisely the purpose of the
"skipped" initially, not to be too strictly bound to a specific config.
Now it's indeed even more flexible and that's better.

Series queued as well, thank you!
Willy