[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d86f33ab-fc41-1a09-f358-c8917625c282@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 12:25:44 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: register drm_bridge
On 09/07/2023 04:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The current approach to handling DP on bridge-enabled platforms requires
> a chain of DP bridges up to the USB-C connector. Register a last DRM
> bridge for such chain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c
> index a905160dd860..ca832a28176e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/qcom/qcom_pmic_typec.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> #include <linux/usb/role.h>
> #include <linux/usb/tcpm.h>
> #include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
> +
> #include "qcom_pmic_typec_pdphy.h"
> #include "qcom_pmic_typec_port.h"
>
> @@ -33,6 +36,7 @@ struct pmic_typec {
> struct pmic_typec_port *pmic_typec_port;
> bool vbus_enabled;
> struct mutex lock; /* VBUS state serialization */
> + struct drm_bridge bridge;
> };
>
> #define tcpc_to_tcpm(_tcpc_) container_of(_tcpc_, struct pmic_typec, tcpc)
> @@ -146,6 +150,16 @@ static int qcom_pmic_typec_init(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_pmic_typec_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> + enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
> +{
> + return flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> +}
Should that be -ENODEV instead ?
> +
> +static const struct drm_bridge_funcs qcom_pmic_typec_bridge_funcs = {
> + .attach = qcom_pmic_typec_attach,
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_pmic_typec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct pmic_typec *tcpm;
> @@ -208,6 +222,17 @@ static int qcom_pmic_typec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mutex_init(&tcpm->lock);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tcpm);
>
> + tcpm->bridge.funcs = &qcom_pmic_typec_bridge_funcs;
> +#if CONFIG_OF
> + tcpm->bridge.of_node = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "connector");
> +#endif
> + tcpm->bridge.ops = DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD;
> + tcpm->bridge.type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_USB;
> +
> + ret = devm_drm_bridge_add(dev, &tcpm->bridge);
I think you need to either
Kconfig + depends on DRM
or
#if CONFIG_DRM
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4773470.html
Kconfig for preference
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists