[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZKw3H2cJzRPZa29N@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:51:43 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate
io queues
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 05:14:15PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > >
> > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > >
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > still returns all CPUs.
> >
> > That's simply broken. Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
>
> That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>
> On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
>
> So Cc our arch(arm & ppc64) & kdump guys wrt. passing 'maxcpus=1' for
> kdump kernel.
>
> > setups, otherwise you'll have to paper over it in all kind of
> > drivers.
>
> The issue is only triggered for drivers which use managed irq &
> multiple hw queues.
Is the problem that the managed interrupt sets the effective irq
affinity to an offline CPU? You mentioned observed timeouts; are you
seeing the "completion polled" nvme message?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists