[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_NwriVSHx27GTpHN1gWZ3Y=dd6ObmvSYHaBX=uf_DEo-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:19:33 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: sunran001@...suo.com
Cc: airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
Applied. Thanks!
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:38 AM <sunran001@...suo.com> wrote:
>
> Fix nine occurrences of the checkpatch.pl error:
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> index c1bbfbe28bda..11a1940bb26d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static struct {
> atom_op_shr, ATOM_ARG_MC}, {
> atom_op_debug, 0},};
>
> -static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
> {
> int base = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + 4 + 2 * index);
> int len, ws, ps, ptr;
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
> {
> int r;
>
> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uin
> return r;
> }
>
> -int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t *
> params)
> +int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t
> *params)
> {
> int r;
> mutex_lock(&ctx->scratch_mutex);
> @@ -1359,8 +1359,8 @@ void atom_destroy(struct atom_context *ctx)
> }
>
> bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index,
> - uint16_t * size, uint8_t * frev, uint8_t * crev,
> - uint16_t * data_start)
> + uint16_t *size, uint8_t *frev, uint8_t *crev,
> + uint16_t *data_start)
> {
> int offset = index * 2 + 4;
> int idx = CU16(ctx->data_table + offset);
> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context
> *ctx, int index,
> return true;
> }
>
> -bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> * frev,
> - uint8_t * crev)
> +bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> *frev,
> + uint8_t *crev)
> {
> int offset = index * 2 + 4;
> int idx = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + offset);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists