linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:19:33 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     sunran001@...suo.com
Cc:     airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"

Applied.  Thanks!

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:38 AM <sunran001@...suo.com> wrote:
>
> Fix nine occurrences of the checkpatch.pl error:
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 14 +++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> index c1bbfbe28bda..11a1940bb26d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static struct {
>       atom_op_shr, ATOM_ARG_MC}, {
>   atom_op_debug, 0},};
>
> -static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
>   {
>       int base = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + 4 + 2 * index);
>       int len, ws, ps, ptr;
> @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
>       return ret;
>   }
>
> -int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t * params)
> +int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct atom_context *ctx, int
> index, uint32_t *params)
>   {
>       int r;
>
> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int atom_execute_table_scratch_unlocked(struct
> atom_context *ctx, int index, uin
>       return r;
>   }
>
> -int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t *
> params)
> +int atom_execute_table(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32_t
> *params)
>   {
>       int r;
>       mutex_lock(&ctx->scratch_mutex);
> @@ -1359,8 +1359,8 @@ void atom_destroy(struct atom_context *ctx)
>   }
>
>   bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index,
> -                uint16_t * size, uint8_t * frev, uint8_t * crev,
> -                uint16_t * data_start)
> +                uint16_t *size, uint8_t *frev, uint8_t *crev,
> +                uint16_t *data_start)
>   {
>       int offset = index * 2 + 4;
>       int idx = CU16(ctx->data_table + offset);
> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ bool atom_parse_data_header(struct atom_context
> *ctx, int index,
>       return true;
>   }
>
> -bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> * frev,
> -               uint8_t * crev)
> +bool atom_parse_cmd_header(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint8_t
> *frev,
> +               uint8_t *crev)
>   {
>       int offset = index * 2 + 4;
>       int idx = CU16(ctx->cmd_table + offset);