[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZKxxsPKf4uGoJWdX@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:01:36 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Mrunal Patel <mpatel@...hat.com>,
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@...hat.com>,
Brent Rowsell <browsell@...hat.com>,
Peter Hunt <pehunt@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] cgroup/cpuset: Allow suppression of sched domain
rebuild in update_cpumasks_hier()
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> A single partition setup and tear-down operation can lead to
> multiple rebuild_sched_domains_locked() calls which is a waste of
> effort. This can partly be mitigated by adding a flag to suppress the
> rebuild_sched_domains_locked() call in update_cpumasks_hier(). Since
> a Boolean flag has already been passed as the 3rd argument to
> update_cpumasks_hier(), we can extend that to a full flag word.
>
> The sched domain rebuild suppression is now enabled in
> update_sibling_cpumasks() as all it callers will do the sched domain
> rebuild after its return later on anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Applied 1-3 to cgroup/for-6.6.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists