linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sh: hd64461: fix virq offsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e109b448163cae9c33c285fbb2f46063@artur-rojek.eu>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 01:25:09 +0200
From:   Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: hd64461: fix virq offsets

On 2023-07-09 14:59, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 14:56 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
>> On 2023-07-09 14:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> > Hi Artur!
>> >
>> > On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 14:13 +0200, Artur Rojek wrote:
>> > > A recent change to start counting SuperH IRQ #s from 16 breaks support
>> > > for the Hitachi HD64461 companion chip.
>> > >
>> > > Move the offchip IRQ base and HD64461 IRQ # by 16 in order to
>> > > accommodate for the new virq numbering rules.
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: a8ac2961148e ("sh: Avoid using IRQ0 on SH3 and SH4")
>> > > Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
>> > > ---
>> > >  arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig        | 4 ++--
>> > >  arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h | 2 +-
>> > >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig b/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig
>> > > index efde2edb5627..9659a0bc58de 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig
>> > > +++ b/arch/sh/cchips/Kconfig
>> > > @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ endchoice
>> > >  config HD64461_IRQ
>> > >  	int "HD64461 IRQ"
>> > >  	depends on HD64461
>> > > -	default "36"
>> > > +	default "52"
>> > >  	help
>> > > -	  The default setting of the HD64461 IRQ is 36.
>> > > +	  The default setting of the HD64461 IRQ is 52.
>> > >
>> > >  	  Do not change this unless you know what you are doing.
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
>> > > b/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
>> > > index afb24cb034b1..6d85db6cf54b 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
>> > > +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/hd64461.h
>> > > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
>> > >  #define	HD64461_NIMR		HD64461_IO_OFFSET(0x5002)
>> > >
>> > >  #define	HD64461_IRQBASE		OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE
>> > > -#define	OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE	64
>> > > +#define	OFFCHIP_IRQ_BASE	80
>> > >  #define	HD64461_IRQ_NUM		16
>> > >
>> > >  #define	HD64461_IRQ_UART	(HD64461_IRQBASE+5)
>> >
>> > I think it would be better to write this as (64 + 16) for consistency
>> > with the other changes made by Sergey.
>> 
>> Sure, I will send v2 with this change, although the same can't be
>> applied to HD64461_IRQ value above, so some inconsistency will exist
>> either way.
>> 
> 
> That's okay, that's the user-facing part ;-).
> 
> Btw, did you verify that the default assigned IRQ is actually changed 
> from
> 36 to 52 when the machine boots?
If I understood the question correctly, then yes, the new virq number
for HD64461 interrupt is now 52 and the cchip interrupts need this patch
to work.

Cheers,
Artur
> 
> Adrian