[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230710064705.1847287-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:47:05 +0800
From: chengming.zhou@...ux.dev
To: axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] blk-flush: don't need to end rq twice for non post-flush requests
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Now we unconditionally blk_rq_init_flush() to replace rq->end_io to
make rq return twice back to the flush state machine for post-flush.
Obviously, non post-flush requests don't need it, they don't need to
end request twice, so they don't need to replace rq->end_io callback.
And the same for requests with the FUA bit on hardware with FUA support.
So we move blk_rq_init_flush() to REQ_FSEQ_DATA stage and only replace
rq->end_io if it needs post-flush. Otherwise, it can end like normal
request and doesn't need to return back to the flush state machine.
There are also some other good points:
1. all requests on hardware with FUA support won't have post-flush, so
all of them don't need to end twice.
2. non post-flush requests won't have RQF_FLUSH_SEQ rq_flags set, so
they can merge like normal requests.
3. we don't account non post-flush requests in flush_data_in_flight,
since there is no point to defer pending flush for these requests.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
---
block/blk-flush.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 094a6adb2718..1b92654e8757 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ enum {
static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q,
struct blk_flush_queue *fq, blk_opf_t flags);
+static void blk_rq_init_flush(struct request *rq);
static inline struct blk_flush_queue *
blk_get_flush_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx)
@@ -187,7 +188,15 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
break;
case REQ_FSEQ_DATA:
- fq->flush_data_in_flight++;
+ /*
+ * Only for requests that need post-flush,
+ * we need to do rq->end_io replacement trick
+ * to return back to the flush state machine.
+ */
+ if (!(rq->flush.seq & REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH)) {
+ blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
+ fq->flush_data_in_flight++;
+ }
spin_lock(&q->requeue_lock);
list_move_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->flush_list);
spin_unlock(&q->requeue_lock);
@@ -202,7 +211,13 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
* normal completion and end it.
*/
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
- blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
+ /*
+ * Only for requests that had rq->end_io replaced,
+ * we need to restore rq->end_io and make it a normal
+ * request before the second end.
+ */
+ if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ)
+ blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
blk_mq_end_request(rq, error);
break;
@@ -389,7 +404,6 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret mq_flush_data_end_io(struct request *rq,
static void blk_rq_init_flush(struct request *rq)
{
- rq->flush.seq = 0;
rq->rq_flags |= RQF_FLUSH_SEQ;
rq->flush.saved_end_io = rq->end_io; /* Usually NULL */
rq->end_io = mq_flush_data_end_io;
@@ -424,6 +438,7 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
* the request accounting.
*/
rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
+ rq->flush.seq = 0;
switch (policy) {
case 0:
@@ -458,7 +473,6 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
* Mark the request as part of a flush sequence and submit it
* for further processing to the flush state machine.
*/
- blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
spin_lock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, REQ_FSEQ_ACTIONS & ~policy, 0);
spin_unlock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists