[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230710184839.4680f3e7983470c650cc24ad@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:48:39 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: kprobes: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 02:53:53 +0800
Li zeming <zeming@...china.com> wrote:
> it is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 00e177de91cc..83e6f76fca04 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int kprobe_ftrace_enabled;
> static int __arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> int *cnt)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> static int __disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> int *cnt)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> @@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ void kprobe_free_init_mem(void)
>
> static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> {
> - int i, err = 0;
> + int i, err;
>
> /* FIXME allocate the probe table, currently defined statically */
> /* initialize all list heads */
> --
> 2.18.2
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists