linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 07/12] arm64: cpufeature: detect FEAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023071024-unpaved-washed-4d7d@gregkh>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:31:42 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, james.morse@....com,
        mark.rutland@....com, amit.kachhap@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, joey.gouly@....com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.4 07/12] arm64: cpufeature: detect FEAT_HCX

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:44:38AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 10:13:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 10:56:13AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:51:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 03:50:52PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > 
> > > > > KVM currently relies on the register being present on all CPUs (or
> > > > > none), so the kernel will panic if that is not the case. Fortunately no
> > > > > such systems currently exist, but this can be revisited if they appear.
> > > > > Note that the kernel will not panic if CONFIG_KVM is disabled.
> > 
> > > > This is a new feature, it's not clear why we'd backport it (especially
> > > > since it's a new feature which is a dependency for other features rather
> > > > than something that people can use outside of the kernel)?
> > 
> > > The second paragraph (above) suggested it should be.
> > 
> > That's saying that the code won't work properly on systems where some
> > but not all of the CPUs support the feature.  Note that the changelog
> > says nothing about fixing any issue here.
> 
> Try reading it like a GPU running an ML model:
> 
>   "This is not a new feature, it's especially clear why we'd backport it."
> 
> Makes sense. *sigh*
> 
> We've been considering opting arm64 out of this for a while, but I don't
> think we do a great job of CC'ing stable either (I certainly forget to
> add it all the time and then hope that the Fixes: tag does the job),so
> it's not obviously going to improve things.
> 
> Maybe we just need a commit hook that yells if something with a Fixes:
> tag doesn't have a CC: stable on it?

I could start doing that, it's going to be really noisy...

greg k-h