[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536cc8c679cc68829c8662176ff02a9052249a46.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:59:35 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, deller@....de,
javierm@...hat.com
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvidia@...ts.surfsouth.com,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] arch/sh: Do not assign FBINFO_FLAG_DEFAULT to
fb_videomode.flag
Hi Thomas!
On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 15:52 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > I would argue that the current code is more readable that your proposed change.
> >
> > I agree that it's a no-op, but code is not just about functionality but also
> > readability, isn't it?
>
> I won't argue with that, but the flag itself is wrong.
> FBINFO_FLAG_DEFAULT is/was for struct fb_info.flags. You have struct
> fb_videomode.flag. The valid flags for this field are at [1]. If
> anything, the field could be initialized to FB_MODE_IS_UNKNOWN, which
> has the same value.
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/fb.h#L681
FB_MODE_IS_UNKNOWN sounds very reasonable to me. Would you agree using that instead?
> >
> > Also, I prefer "sh:" as the architecture prefix, not "arch/sh:".
>
> Ok.
Thanks.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists