| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230711152144.755177-1-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:21:43 +0200
From: Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
To: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: (dimmtemp) Support more than 32 DIMMs
From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
This patch introduces support for handling more than 32 DIMMs by
utilizing bitmap operations. The changes ensure that the driver can
handle a higher number of DIMMs efficiently.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
index ed968401f93c..ce89da3937a0 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
@@ -219,19 +219,21 @@ static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
{
int chan_rank_max = priv->gen_info->chan_rank_max;
int dimm_idx_max = priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
- u32 chan_rank_empty = 0;
- u32 dimm_mask = 0;
- int chan_rank, dimm_idx, ret;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(chan_rank_empty, CHAN_RANK_MAX);
+
+ int chan_rank, dimm_idx, ret, i;
u32 pcs;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_TYPE(chan_rank_empty) < CHAN_RANK_MAX);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_TYPE(dimm_mask) < DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
if (chan_rank_max * dimm_idx_max > DIMM_NUMS_MAX) {
WARN_ONCE(1, "Unsupported number of DIMMs - chan_rank_max: %d, dimm_idx_max: %d",
chan_rank_max, dimm_idx_max);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ bitmap_zero(dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
+ bitmap_zero(chan_rank_empty, CHAN_RANK_MAX);
+
for (chan_rank = 0; chan_rank < chan_rank_max; chan_rank++) {
ret = peci_pcs_read(priv->peci_dev, PECI_PCS_DDR_DIMM_TEMP, chan_rank, &pcs);
if (ret) {
@@ -242,7 +244,7 @@ static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
* detection to be performed at a later point in time.
*/
if (ret == -EINVAL) {
- chan_rank_empty |= BIT(chan_rank);
+ bitmap_set(chan_rank_empty, chan_rank, 1);
continue;
}
@@ -251,7 +253,7 @@ static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
for (dimm_idx = 0; dimm_idx < dimm_idx_max; dimm_idx++)
if (__dimm_temp(pcs, dimm_idx))
- dimm_mask |= BIT(chan_rank * dimm_idx_max + dimm_idx);
+ bitmap_set(dimm_mask, chan_rank * dimm_idx_max + dimm_idx, 1);
}
/*
@@ -260,7 +262,7 @@ static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
* host platform boot. Retrying a couple of times lets us make sure
* that the state is persistent.
*/
- if (chan_rank_empty == GENMASK(chan_rank_max - 1, 0)) {
+ if (bitmap_full(chan_rank_empty, chan_rank_max)) {
if (priv->no_dimm_retry_count < NO_DIMM_RETRY_COUNT_MAX) {
priv->no_dimm_retry_count++;
@@ -274,14 +276,16 @@ static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
* It's possible that memory training is not done yet. In this case we
* defer the detection to be performed at a later point in time.
*/
- if (!dimm_mask) {
+ if (bitmap_empty(dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX)) {
priv->no_dimm_retry_count = 0;
return -EAGAIN;
}
- dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Scanned populated DIMMs: %#x\n", dimm_mask);
+ for_each_set_bit(i, dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX) {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Found DIMM%#x\n", i);
+ }
- bitmap_from_arr32(priv->dimm_mask, &dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
+ bitmap_copy(priv->dimm_mask, dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
return 0;
}
base-commit: 4dbbaf8fbdbd13adc80731b2452257857e4c2d8b
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists