[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230711203017.cdfe2nrjx7lt25tm@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:30:17 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Guiting Shen <aarongt.shen@...il.com>
Cc: claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: atmel: Enable clk when pwm already enabled in
bootloader
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:09:05AM +0800, Guiting Shen wrote:
> +static int atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on(struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + int err;
> + u32 sr;
> +
> + sr = atmel_pwm_readl(atmel_pwm, PWM_SR);
> + if (!sr)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < atmel_pwm->chip.npwm; i++) {
> + if (!(sr & (1 << i)))
> + continue;
> +
> + err = clk_enable(atmel_pwm->clk);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(atmel_pwm->chip.dev,
> + "failed to enable clock: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(err));
Here you leak possibly a few enables. While it's not likely that the
(say) third enable goes wrong, it's also not that hard to handle?!
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists