[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230711135056.4b1fd94a@jacob-builder>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:50:56 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] iommu: Add common code to handle IO page faults
Hi Lu,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:06:36 +0800, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
wrote:
> The individual iommu drivers report iommu faults by calling
> iommu_report_device_fault(), where a pre-registered device fault handler
> is called to route the fault to another fault handler installed on the
> corresponding iommu domain.
>
> The pre-registered device fault handler is static and won't be dynamic
> as the fault handler is eventually per iommu domain. Replace the device
> fault handler with a static common code to avoid unnecessary code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index da340f11c5f5..41328f03e8b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1278,6 +1278,28 @@ int iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(struct
> device *dev) }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler);
>
> +static int iommu_handle_io_pgfault(struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_fault *fault)
> +{
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + if (fault->type != IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQ)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID)
> + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev,
> fault->prm.pasid, 0);
> + else
> + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
we don't support IOPF w/o PASID yet, right?
> +
> + if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (domain->iopf_handler == iommu_sva_handle_iopf)
> + return iommu_queue_iopf(fault, dev);
Just wondering why have a special treatment for SVA domain. Can
iommu_queue_iopf() be used as SVA domain->iopf_handler?
> +
> + return domain->iopf_handler(fault, dev, domain->fault_data);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * iommu_report_device_fault() - Report fault event to device driver
> * @dev: the device
> @@ -1320,7 +1342,7 @@ int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev,
> struct iommu_fault_event *evt) mutex_unlock(&fparam->lock);
> }
>
> - ret = fparam->handler(&evt->fault, fparam->data);
> + ret = iommu_handle_io_pgfault(dev, &evt->fault);
> if (ret && evt_pending) {
> mutex_lock(&fparam->lock);
> list_del(&evt_pending->list);
Thanks,
Jacob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists