[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230711143151.3191f23c@jacob-builder>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:31:51 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] iommu: Make fault_param generic
Hi BaoLu,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:06:38 +0800, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
wrote:
> The iommu faults, including recoverable faults (IO page faults) and
> unrecoverable faults (DMA faults), are generic to all devices. The
> iommu faults could possibly be triggered for every device.
>
> The fault_param pointer under struct dev_iommu is the per-device fault
> data. Therefore, the fault_param pointer should be allocated during
> iommu device probe and freed when the device is released.
>
> With this done, the individual iommu drivers that support iopf have no
> need to call iommu_[un]register_device_fault_handler() any more.
> This will make it easier for the iommu drivers to support iopf, and it
> will also make the fault_param allocation and free simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 13 +------------
> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 18 ++++--------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c index
> a5a63b1c947e..fa8ab9d413f8 100644 ---
> a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c +++
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c @@ -437,7 +437,6 @@
> bool arm_smmu_master_sva_enabled(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> static int arm_smmu_master_sva_enable_iopf(struct arm_smmu_master
> *master) {
> - int ret;
> struct device *dev = master->dev;
>
> /*
> @@ -450,16 +449,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_sva_enable_iopf(struct
> arm_smmu_master *master) if (!master->iopf_enabled)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = iopf_queue_add_device(master->smmu->evtq.iopf, dev);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = iommu_register_device_fault_handler(dev, iommu_queue_iopf,
> dev);
> - if (ret) {
> - iopf_queue_remove_device(master->smmu->evtq.iopf, dev);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - return 0;
> + return iopf_queue_add_device(master->smmu->evtq.iopf, dev);
> }
>
> static void arm_smmu_master_sva_disable_iopf(struct arm_smmu_master
> *master) @@ -469,7 +459,6 @@ static void
> arm_smmu_master_sva_disable_iopf(struct arm_smmu_master *master) if
> (!master->iopf_enabled) return;
>
> - iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(dev);
> iopf_queue_remove_device(master->smmu->evtq.iopf, dev);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index 5c8c5cdc36cf..22e43db20252 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -4594,23 +4594,14 @@ static int intel_iommu_enable_iopf(struct device
> *dev) if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = iommu_register_device_fault_handler(dev, iommu_queue_iopf,
> dev);
> - if (ret)
> - goto iopf_remove_device;
> -
> ret = pci_enable_pri(pdev, PRQ_DEPTH);
> - if (ret)
> - goto iopf_unregister_handler;
> + if (ret) {
> + iopf_queue_remove_device(iommu->iopf_queue, dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> info->pri_enabled = 1;
>
> return 0;
> -
> -iopf_unregister_handler:
> - iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(dev);
> -iopf_remove_device:
> - iopf_queue_remove_device(iommu->iopf_queue, dev);
> -
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static int intel_iommu_disable_iopf(struct device *dev)
> @@ -4637,7 +4628,6 @@ static int intel_iommu_disable_iopf(struct device
> *dev)
> * fault handler and removing device from iopf queue should never
> * fail.
> */
> - WARN_ON(iommu_unregister_device_fault_handler(dev));
> WARN_ON(iopf_queue_remove_device(iommu->iopf_queue, dev));
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 65895b987e22..8d1f0935ea71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,15 @@ static int dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> mutex_init(¶m->lock);
> + param->fault_param = kzalloc(sizeof(*param->fault_param),
> GFP_KERNEL);
since fault_param is _always_ allocated/freed along with param, can we merge
into one allocation? i.e.
struct dev_iommu {
struct mutex lock;
- struct iommu_fault_param *fault_param;
+ struct iommu_fault_param fault_param;
> + if (!param->fault_param) {
> + kfree(param);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + mutex_init(¶m->fault_param->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(¶m->fault_param->faults);
> dev->iommu = param;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -312,6 +320,12 @@ static void dev_iommu_free(struct device *dev)
> fwnode_handle_put(param->fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
> kfree(param->fwspec);
> }
> + /*
> + * All pending faults should have been drained before
> + * device release.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(¶m->fault_param->faults));
> + kfree(param->fault_param);
> kfree(param);
> }
>
Thanks,
Jacob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists