linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based on transfer length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168911304110.642798.9300862955272613470.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 23:04:01 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stefan Moring <stefan.moring@...hnolution.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based on
 transfer length

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:54:06 +0200, Stefan Moring wrote:
> IMX51 supports 4096 bit burst lengths. Using the spi transfer length
> instead of bits_per_word increases performance significantly.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Increase imx51 ecspi burst length based on transfer length
      commit: 15a6af94a2779d5dfb42ee4bfac858ea8e964a3f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark