[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fec44f45-f5d8-69e6-ebd5-f10fc70e4b2f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:26:30 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: <paulmck@...nel.org>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu: Don't dump the stalled CPU on where RCU GP
kthread last ran twice
On 2023/7/11 4:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 03:55:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:06 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 03:30:20PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>>> The stacks of all stalled CPUs will be dumped. If the CPU on where RCU GP
>>>> kthread last ran is stalled, its stack does not need to be dumped again.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> This one looks good. Please feel free to rebase it before 1/2 and repost.
>>
>> Just a small comment:
>> I wondered if this would make it harder to identify which stack among
>> the various CPU stacks corresponds to the one the GP kthread is
>> running on. However, this line does print the CPU number of the
>> thread, so it is perhaps not an issue:
>>
>> pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%ld f%#x
>> %s(%d) ->state=%#x ->cpu=%d\n",
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>
> Thank you! Zhen Lei, please feel free to add Joel's Reviewed-by on your
> next posting.
OK
>
> Thanx, Paul
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists