[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7adcefb-1e49-79f0-33e0-c84c82e6ed95@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:19:22 +0800
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@...el.com>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/38] sh: Implement the new page table range API
On 7/11/2023 12:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> What's the best way to test this? Just build Andrew's kernel?
I didn't see the patchset shown on:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/log/?h=mm-unstable
yet. I believe the patchset will be in mm-unstable soon.
>From the cover letter:
The point of all this is better performance, and Fengwei Yin has
measured improvement on x86. I suspect you'll see improvement on
your architecture too. Try the new will-it-scale test mentioned here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230206140639.538867-5-fengwei.yin@intel.com/
You'll need to run it on an XFS filesystem and have
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE set.
It's for performance testing. For functionality, I used:
- System boot/reboot.
- Using browser to access internet, Thunderbird to check email.
- Build kernel.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
>
> I would like to give it a go on my SH7785LCR to be sure nothing breaks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists