[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc054877-52c6-9e61-8572-3068c53a86de@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:52:31 +0530
From: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add PMX75 compatible
On 7/11/2023 11:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 07:46, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add PMX75 compatibles for PMIC found in SDX75 platform.
>> While at it, update the entry for SDX65 as well.
> Everything is an update...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> index b949850..72b533c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ description: |
>> For PMR735A, smps1 - smps3, ldo1 - ldo7
>> For PMX55, smps1 - smps7, ldo1 - ldo16
>> For PMX65, smps1 - smps8, ldo1 - ldo21
>> + For PMX75, smps1 - smps10, ldo1 - ldo21
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,pmr735a-rpmh-regulators
>> - qcom,pmx55-rpmh-regulators
>> - qcom,pmx65-rpmh-regulators
>> + - qcom,pmx75-rpmh-regulators
>>
>> qcom,pmic-id:
>> description: |
>> @@ -424,10 +426,28 @@ allOf:
>> vdd-l11-l13-supply: true
>> patternProperties:
>> "^vdd-l[1347]-supply$": true
>> - "^vdd-l1[0245789]-supply$": true
>> + "^vdd-l1[024579]-supply$": true
> Why? Does not look related at all.
This update is because sdx65 does not have vdd-l18-supply separately and
its
already part of vdd-l2-l18-supply property mentioned in the properties
field.
Thanks,
Rohit.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists