[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d52eaa7-0934-97fd-0288-9e8ed2f82bee@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:23:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: huaqian.li@...mens.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: huaqianlee@...il.com, nm@...com, vigneshr@...com,
kristo@...nel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com,
baocheng.su@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: ti,rti-wdt: Add support for
WDIOF_CARDRESET
On 11/07/2023 11:17, huaqian.li@...mens.com wrote:
> From: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
>
> TI RTI (Real Time Interrupt) Watchdog doesn't support to record the
> watchdog cause. Add a reserved memory to know the last reboot was caused
> by the watchdog card. In the reserved memory, some specific info will be
> saved to indicate whether the watchdog reset was triggered in last
> boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
> ---
Missing changelog.
> .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.yaml | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.yaml
> index fc553211e42d..f227db08dc70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/ti,rti-wdt.yaml
> @@ -26,7 +26,18 @@ properties:
> - ti,j7-rti-wdt
>
> reg:
> - maxItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
The expected syntax is in such case:
items:
- description: ...
- description: ...
You will find plenty of examples for this.
> + description:
> + - Contains the address and the size of MCU RTI register.
> + - Contains the address and the size of reserved memory, which
I don't think Conor suggested using reg of the device, but reg of
reserved memory. This is not device address space, but just some random
memory.
memory-region seems proper to me. We were just discussing totally
useless new property of size.
What's more - you did not test it... so usual template:
It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
`make dtbs_check` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
for instructions).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists