[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05554015-6b08-c194-9d27-af5539e3ce46@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:57:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
richardcochran@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, geert+renesas@...der.be,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, nfraprado@...labora.com,
rafal@...ecki.pl, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add support for nsscc node
On 11/07/2023 11:35, Devi Priya wrote:
> Add a node for the nss clock controller found on ipq9574 based devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> index f120c7c52351..257ce4a5bfd5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h>
>
> / {
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> @@ -17,6 +19,30 @@
> #size-cells = <2>;
>
> clocks {
> + bias_pll_cc_clk: bias-pll-cc-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <1200000000>;
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk: bias-pll-nss-noc-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <461500000>;
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + bias_pll_ubi_nc_clk: bias-pll-ubi-nc-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <353000000>;
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + gcc_gpll0_out_aux: gcc-gpll0-out-aux {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <800000000>;
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + };
Isn't this GCC clock?
> +
> sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> @@ -620,6 +646,24 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
> };
> +
> + nsscc: nsscc@...00000 {
Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists