linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3262be5-be66-661c-1feb-d663a057c2b2@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:32:41 +0530
From:   Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, <quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>, <quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID


On 7/10/2023 5:40 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10.07.2023 13:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
>>> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
>>> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000			539
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000			545
>>>   #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010			587
>>> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019			569
>> What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
>> the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
>> ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
>> disappear...
> This + from my experience, SOCID entries are set in stone and freed
> indices are never reclaimed


This SKU is planned but never productized. That's why I removed it.

May be I should be more precise in the commit title. Should I leave it 
as it is / remove it?


Thanks, Kathiravan T.

>
> Konrad
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>