[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95c4e875-02f1-6239-bb62-41b709d21541@ghiti.fr>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:07:22 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: guoren@...nel.org, palmer@...osinc.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
zong.li@...ive.com, atishp@...shpatra.org, jszhang@...nel.org,
bjorn@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] riscv: kexec: Fixup synchronization problem between
init_mm and active_mm
Hi Guo,
On 10/07/2023 07:40, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> The machine_kexec() uses set_memory_x to modify the direct mapping
> attributes from RW to RWX. But set_memory_x only changes the init_mm's
> attributes, not current->active_mm, so when kexec jumps into
> control_buffer, the instruction page fault happens, and there is no
> minor_pagefault for it, then panic.
I think it needs more details like this:
"The current implementation of set_memory_x does not split hugepages in
the linear mapping and then when a PGD mapping is used, the whole PGD is
marked as executable. But changing the permissions at the PGD level must
be propagated to all the page tables."
>
> The bug is found on an MMU_sv39 machine, and the direct mapping used a
> 1GB PUD, the pgd entries. Here is the bug output:
>
> kexec_core: Starting new kernel
> Will call new kernel at 00300000 from hart id 0
> FDT image at 747c7000
> Bye...
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffda23b0d000
> Oops [#1]
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: uinit Not tainted 6.4.0-rc6 #15
> Hardware name: Sophgo Mango (DT)
> epc : 0xffffffda23b0d000
> ra : machine_kexec+0xa6/0xb0
> epc : ffffffda23b0d000 ra : ffffffff80008272 sp : ffffffc80c173d10
> gp : ffffffff8150e1e0 tp : ffffffd9073d2c40 t0 : 0000000000000000
> t1 : 0000000000000042 t2 : 6567616d69205444 s0 : ffffffc80c173d50
> s1 : ffffffd9076c4800 a0 : ffffffd9076c4800 a1 : 0000000000300000
> a2 : 00000000747c7000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : ffffffd800000000
> a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffd903619c40 a7 : ffffffffffffffff
> s2 : ffffffda23b0d000 s3 : 0000000000300000 s4 : 00000000747c7000
> s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000000
> s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000000000000000
> s11: 0000003f940001a0 t3 : ffffffff815351af t4 : ffffffff815351af
> t5 : ffffffff815351b0 t6 : ffffffc80c173b50
> status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: ffffffda23b0d000 cause: 000000000000000c
>
> The solution is to fix machine_kexec() to remap control code page outside
> the linear mapping.
"Given the current flaw in the set_memory_x implementation, the simplest
solution is to ..."
>
> Fixes: 3335068f8721 ("riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping")
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
> ---
> Changelog:
> V2:
> - Use vm_map_ram instead of modifying set_memory_x
> - Correct Fixes tag
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h | 1 +
> arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> index 2b56769cb530..17456e91476e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ crash_setup_regs(struct pt_regs *newregs,
> struct kimage_arch {
> void *fdt; /* For CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
> unsigned long fdt_addr;
> + void *control_code_buffer;
> };
>
> extern const unsigned char riscv_kexec_relocate[];
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> index 2d139b724bc8..eeb209775107 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,14 @@ machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
>
> /* Copy the assembler code for relocation to the control page */
> if (image->type != KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> - control_code_buffer = page_address(image->control_code_page);
> + control_code_buffer = vm_map_ram(&image->control_code_page,
> + KEXEC_CONTROL_PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE,
> + NUMA_NO_NODE);
> + if (control_code_buffer == NULL) {
> + pr_err("Failed to vm_map control page\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> control_code_buffer_sz = page_size(image->control_code_page);
>
> if (unlikely(riscv_kexec_relocate_size > control_code_buffer_sz)) {
> @@ -97,8 +104,7 @@ machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
> memcpy(control_code_buffer, riscv_kexec_relocate,
> riscv_kexec_relocate_size);
>
> - /* Mark the control page executable */
> - set_memory_x((unsigned long) control_code_buffer, 1);
> + internal->control_code_buffer = control_code_buffer;
Where is this mapping marked as executable? I see that vm_map_ram() maps
the pages as PAGE_KERNEL, which does not set PAGE_EXEC.
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -211,7 +217,7 @@ machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
> unsigned long this_cpu_id = __smp_processor_id();
> unsigned long this_hart_id = cpuid_to_hartid_map(this_cpu_id);
> unsigned long fdt_addr = internal->fdt_addr;
> - void *control_code_buffer = page_address(image->control_code_page);
> + void *control_code_buffer = internal->control_code_buffer;
> riscv_kexec_method kexec_method = NULL;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
Otherwise, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists