linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for post-flush requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6825f687-9573-51eb-bb89-17eadb60f71b@linux.dev>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:52:11 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for post-flush requests

On 2023/7/11 19:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 07:06:20PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> Ok, will add a Fixes tag and send it as a separate patch since it's a bug fix.
> 
> Btw, it's probably not worth resending patch 2 until we've figured out
> and dealt with the SATA flush regression that Chuck reported.

Ok, I will not resend patch 2. As for the patch 1, should I resend it as a separate patch
or just put it in that series [1] before other flush optimizations ?

I search on the block mail list, find the issue [2] you mentioned, will look into it too.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230707093722.1338589-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/7A57C7AE-A51A-4254-888B-FE15CA21F9E9@oracle.com/