linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/2] virtiofs submounts forgotten after client memory pressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:37:03 -0700
From:   Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        German Maglione <gmaglione@...hat.com>,
        Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>, Max Reitz <mreitz@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] virtiofs submounts forgotten after client memory
 pressure

Hi,
I recently ran into a situation where a virtiofs client began
encountering EBADF after the client system had an OOM.  After
reproducing the issue and debugging, it appears that the problem is
caused by a virtiofsd submount being forgotten once the dentry
referencing that submount is killed by the shrinker.  In this particular
case, the submount had been bind mounted into a container's mount
namespace.  The reference count on the original dentry was 0, making it
eligible for eviction.  However, because this dentry was also the last
reference the client knew it had, it sent a forget message to the
server.  This caused all future references to the FUSE node-id from
virtiofsd perspective to become invalid.  Subsequent attempts to used
the node-id received an EBADF from the server.

This pair of patches modifies the virtiofs submount code to perform a
lookup on the nodeid that forms the root of the submount.  The patch
before this pulls the revalidate lookup code into a helper function that
can be used both in revalidate and submount superblock fill.

I'm not enamored with this approach, but was hard pressed to think of a
more clever idea.

In the meantime, it's been tested via:

- fstests for virtiofs
- fstests for fuse (against passthrough_ll)
- manual testing to watch how refcounts change between client and server
  in response to filesytem access, umount, and eviction by the shrinker.

Thanks,

-K

Krister Johansen (2):
  fuse: revalidate: move lookup into a separate function
  fuse: ensure that submounts lookup their root

 fs/fuse/dir.c    | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |  6 ++++
 fs/fuse/inode.c  | 32 +++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1