[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1c9dce9-9dbc-46bf-0d18-6d90a3ae7610@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:28:12 +0800
From: Guiting Shen <aarongt.shen@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pwm: atmel: Enable clk when pwm already enabled in
bootloader
On Wed,Jul 12,2023 at 21:55:53PM GMT+8, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:43:47PM +0800, Guiting Shen wrote:
>> The driver would never call clk_enable() if the PWM channel was already
>> enabled in bootloader which lead to dump the warning message "the PWM
>> clock already disabled" when turning off the PWM channel.
>>
>> Add atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on() in probe function to enable clock if
>> the PWM channel was already enabled in bootloader.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guiting Shen <aarongt.shen@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
>> index cdbc23649032..28ea0f7267ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel.c
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>> #define PWM_SR 0x0C
>> #define PWM_ISR 0x1C
>> /* Bit field in SR */
>> -#define PWM_SR_ALL_CH_ON 0x0F
>> +#define PWM_SR_ALL_CH_MASK 0x0F
>>
>> /* The following register is PWM channel related registers */
>> #define PWM_CH_REG_OFFSET 0x200
>> @@ -464,6 +464,37 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_pwm_dt_ids);
>>
>> +static int atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on(struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i;
>> + int err;
>> + u32 sr;
>> +
>> + sr = atmel_pwm_readl(atmel_pwm, PWM_SR);
>> + if (!(sr & PWM_SR_ALL_CH_MASK))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < atmel_pwm->chip.npwm; i++) {
>> + if (!(sr & (1 << i)))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + err = clk_enable(atmel_pwm->clk);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(atmel_pwm->chip.dev,
>> + "failed to enable clock for pwm #%d: %pe\n",
>> + i, ERR_PTR(err));
>> +
>> + while (i--) {
>> + if (sr & (1 << i))
>> + clk_disable(atmel_pwm->clk);
>> + }
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int atmel_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct atmel_pwm_chip *atmel_pwm;
>> @@ -504,8 +535,15 @@ static int atmel_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, atmel_pwm);
>>
>> + ret = atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on(atmel_pwm);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto remove_pwmchip;
>> +
>> return ret;
>>
>> +remove_pwmchip:
>> + pwmchip_remove(&atmel_pwm->chip);
>> +
>
> I'd consider it more natural to do the atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on() call
> before registering the pwmchip. But I guess it works like this, too.
> (Well unless it's possible that there are set bits in PWM_SR and the
> clock is off.)
It need to invoke something like atmel_pwm_disable_clk_if_on() after
failing to register the pwmchip when call the
atmel_pwm_enable_clk_if_on() first which I feel inconvenient.
And it's impossible to enable PWM channels before enabling the clock.
The bits set in PWM_SR means that the PWM channel and the clock turn on.
--
Best regards,
Guiting Shen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists