[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230712150818.GL3100107@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:08:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Rename DIE domain
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 04:02:38PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 12/07/23 16:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thomas just tripped over the x86 topology setup creating a 'DIE' domain
> > for the package mask :-)
> >
> > Since these names are SCHED_DEBUG only, rename them.
> > I don't think anybody *should* be relying on this, but who knows.
> >
>
> FWIW I don't care much about the actual name.
Confusion is due to x86 growing an actual die topology and this not
being it.
Other than that, I can't be bothered too much about the silly name
either.
> There are some stray references to DIE in comments - see below. Bit funny
> to see:
> - * - Package (DIE)
> + * - Package (PKG)
>
> With that:
> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Durr, I did a git-grep SD_INIT_NAME().. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists