linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv,mmio: Use the generic implementation for the I/O accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZK7EKQjCQV7fNPSx@andrea>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:18:01 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv,mmio: Use the generic implementation for the
 I/O accesses

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 08:05:16AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:33:48PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > The current implementation of readX(), writeX() and their "relaxed"
> > variants, readX_relaxed() and writeX_relaxed(), matches the generic
> > implementation; remove the redundant code.
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> 
> This fails to build for (64-bit, I didn't check 32-bit) nommu:
> arch/riscv/include/asm/timex.h:20:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> include/asm-generic/io.h:342:23: error: conflicting types for 'readq_relaxed'; have 'u64(const volatile void *)' {aka 'long long unsigned int(const volatile void *)'}

Thank you for the report, Conor.  Looking at it.

  Andrea