[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CU0B41A94HS4.32OC49OW4W5SW@vincent-arch>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:42:27 +0200
From: "Vincenzo Palazzo" <vincenzopalazzodev@...il.com>
To: "Peter Geis" <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: <kw@...ux.com>, <heiko@...ech.de>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Dan Johansen" <strit@...jaro.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>, <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers: pci: introduce configurable delay for
Rockchip PCIe bus scan
Hi all,
> Perhaps a hook mechanism that allows drivers to register with the
> serror handler and offer to handle specific errors before the generic
> code causes the system panic?
I have some time to work on it. I'm interested in exploring the
solution proposed here. However, I would appreciate some guidance
in understanding how to implement this type of hook to report the error.
Cheers.
Vincent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists