lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:34:05 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "Clemens S." <cspringsguth@...il.com>,
        Martin Belanger <martin.belanger@...l.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVMe <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>,
        Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
        박진환 <jh.i.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Need NVME QUIRK BOGUS for SAMSUNG MZ1WV480HCGL-000MV
 (Samsung SM-953 Datacenter SSD)

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 09:57, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:51:52AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Christoph, you are *literally* involved in a discussion where this is the case.
>
> Yes.  But that's not never ever.  Enterprise storage devices have been
> pretty very good at it, because it is part of the purchase specs.

Your basic logic is lacking.

"Humans are animals" and "Some animals have four legs" are both
undeniabvly true.

That still does *not* mean "Humans have four legs".

And yet hat is *literally* the kind of nonsense you are spouting.

I very much say that "some devices will not have UUID's".

That's a *FACT*.

You then say "Some devices have UUID's, so all devices must have UUIDs".

That's *STUPID*.

Can you really not tell the difference?

           Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ