linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix decoding of raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:52:58 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     brauner@...nel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix decoding of raw_inode timestamps

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:02:49AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> When we covert a timestamp from raw disk format, we need to consider it
> to be signed, as the value may represent a date earlier than 1970. This
> fixes generic/258 on ext4.
> 
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Fixes: f2ddb05870fb ("ext4: convert to ctime accessor functions")
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

Thanks for the fix!

It had been on my list to checking to see if the ext4 kunit tests
would pass, since Jan had mentioned that he had done the work to make
sure the ext4 kunit test would compile, but he hadn't gotten around to
try run the kunit test.  Unfortunately, I hadn't gotten to it.

I *think* the ext4 kunit tests should have caught this as well; out of
curiosity, have you tried running the ext4 kunit tests either before
or after this patch?  If so, what were your findings?

Cheers,

					- Ted