linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] x86/boot: add .sbat section to the bzImage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:01:08 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com>,
        Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lennart@...ttering.net,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] x86/boot: add .sbat section to the bzImage

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 08:56:36PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Everything < 3 is revoked _and_ the generation id in the stable branch
> is _not_ bumped, because it's still vulnerable and so that branch is
> effectively dead and unbootable on any system with secure boot
> enabled. This is a revocation mechanism, not a bug tracking mechanism.
> There's no mix-and-matching.

No, this is a mess waiting to happen.

> Nah, it belongs in both places. Please read the documentation and
> spend at least some time trying to understand the actual problem being

You want to have this patch in the tree - the commit message should
explain why it is needed and not point to some documentation somewhere.

> solved before commenting - or don't comment at all, that's fine too.

Here's a comment for ya:

Naked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette