[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41375c87-f367-3632-051f-64c8b283737c@meta.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:21:52 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...com,
Leizhen <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"KE . LI" <like1@...o.com>,
Padmanabha Srinivasaiah <treasure4paddy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kallsyms: strip LTO-only suffixes from promoted global
functions
On 7/7/23 5:23 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 7/7/23 3:27 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:19 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit 6eb4bd92c1ce ("kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static
>>> functions")
>>> stripped all function/variable suffixes started with '.' regardless
>>> of whether those suffixes are generated at LTO mode or not. In fact,
>>> as far as I know, in LTO mode, when a static function/variable is
>>> promoted to the global scope, '.llvm.<...>' suffix is added.
>>>
>>> The existing mechanism breaks live patch for a LTO kernel even if
>>> no <symbol>.llvm.<...> symbols are involved. For example, for the
>>> following
>>> kernel symbols:
>>> $ grep bpf_verifier_vlog /proc/kallsyms
>>> ffffffff81549f60 t bpf_verifier_vlog
>>> ffffffff8268b430 d bpf_verifier_vlog._entry
>>> ffffffff8282a958 d bpf_verifier_vlog._entry_ptr
>>> ffffffff82e12a1f d bpf_verifier_vlog.__already_done
>>> 'bpf_verifier_vlog' is a static function. '_entry', '_entry_ptr' and
>>> '__already_done' are static variables used inside 'bpf_verifier_vlog',
>>> so llvm promotes them to file-level static with prefix
>>> 'bpf_verifier_vlog.'.
>>> Note that the func-level to file-level static function promotion also
>>> happens without LTO.
>>>
>>> Given a symbol name 'bpf_verifier_vlog', with LTO kernel, current
>>> mechanism will
>>> return 4 symbols to live patch subsystem which current live patching
>>> subsystem cannot handle it. With non-LTO kernel, only one symbol
>>> is returned.
>>>
>>> In [1], we have a lengthy discussion, the suggestion is to separate two
>>> cases:
>>> (1). new symbols with suffix which are generated regardless of
>>> whether
>>> LTO is enabled or not, and
>>> (2). new symbols with suffix generated only when LTO is enabled.
>>>
>>> The cleanup_symbol_name() should only remove suffixes for case (2).
>>> Case (1) should not be changed so it can work uniformly with or
>>> without LTO.
>>>
>>> This patch removed LTO-only suffix '.llvm.<...>' so live patching and
>>> tracing should work the same way for non-LTO kernel.
>>> The cleanup_symbol_name() in scripts/kallsyms.c is also changed to
>>> have the same
>>> filtering pattern so both kernel and kallsyms tool have the same
>>> expectation on the order of symbols.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20230615170048.2382735-1-song@kernel.org/T/#u
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6eb4bd92c1ce ("kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static
>>> functions")
>>> Reported-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch and improving live patch with LTO. Looking back
>> at the internal report that resulted in
>> commit 6eb4bd92c1ce ("kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static
>> functions")
>> your version was what I originally had. I did not leave a comment as
>> to why I changed it when I sent it 2 years ago, and no longer recall
>> the reason.
>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> Nick, thanks for the review. I am not sure how this patch could
> be merged into the mainline. I checked your patch
> 6eb4bd92c1ce ("kallsyms: strip LTO suffixes from static functions")
> and it looks like the patch was merged by Kees Cook.
>
> I added Kees in the 'To' list. Kees, could you help merge
> this patch if you are okay with the change?
Looks like Kees might be on vacation. Nick, Petr, do you
have any suggestions who could take this patch? Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Yonghong
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/kallsyms.c | 5 ++---
>>> scripts/kallsyms.c | 6 +++---
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Changelogs:
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> . add 'Reported-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>'
>>> . also fix in scripts/kallsyms.c.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/kallsyms.c b/kernel/kallsyms.c
>>> index 77747391f49b..4874508bb950 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/kallsyms.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/kallsyms.c
>>> @@ -174,11 +174,10 @@ static bool cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
>>> * LLVM appends various suffixes for local functions and
>>> variables that
>>> * must be promoted to global scope as part of LTO. This
>>> can break
>>> * hooking of static functions with kprobes. '.' is not a valid
>>> - * character in an identifier in C. Suffixes observed:
>>> + * character in an identifier in C. Suffixes only in LLVM LTO
>>> observed:
>>> * - foo.llvm.[0-9a-f]+
>>> - * - foo.[0-9a-f]+
>>> */
>>> - res = strchr(s, '.');
>>> + res = strstr(s, ".llvm.");
>>> if (res) {
>>> *res = '\0';
>>> return true;
>>> diff --git a/scripts/kallsyms.c b/scripts/kallsyms.c
>>> index 0d2db41177b2..13af6d0ff845 100644
>>> --- a/scripts/kallsyms.c
>>> +++ b/scripts/kallsyms.c
>>> @@ -346,10 +346,10 @@ static void cleanup_symbol_name(char *s)
>>> * ASCII[_] = 5f
>>> * ASCII[a-z] = 61,7a
>>> *
>>> - * As above, replacing '.' with '\0' does not affect the main
>>> sorting,
>>> - * but it helps us with subsorting.
>>> + * As above, replacing the first '.' in ".llvm." with '\0'
>>> does not
>>> + * affect the main sorting, but it helps us with subsorting.
>>> */
>>> - p = strchr(s, '.');
>>> + p = strstr(s, ".llvm.");
>>> if (p)
>>> *p = '\0';
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists