lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b733848-2745-e6ef-f517-039712bbe7af@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:39:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/53] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,icc: Introduce
 fixed BCM voter indices

On 11/07/2023 14:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> It makes zero (or less) sense to consume BCM voters per interconnect
> provider. They are shared throughout the entire system and it's enough
> to keep a single reference to each of them.
> 
> Storing them in a shared array at fixed indices will let us improve both
> the representation of the RPMh architecture (every RSC can hold a resource
> vote on any bus, they're not limited in that regard) and save as much as
> kilobytes worth of RAM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> index cd34f36daaaa..9c13ef8a044e 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h
> @@ -23,4 +23,12 @@
>  #define QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS		(QCOM_ICC_TAG_AMC | QCOM_ICC_TAG_WAKE |\
>  					 QCOM_ICC_TAG_SLEEP)
>  
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_APPS		0
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_DISP		1
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM0		2
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM1		3
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_CAM2		4
> +
> +#define ICC_BCM_VOTER_MAX		64

I proposed to skip the max. If you actually use it, you won't be able to
change it ever.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ