linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230712224251.26482-1-iuliana.prodan@oss.nxp.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 01:42:51 +0300
From:   "Iuliana Prodan (OSS)" <iuliana.prodan@....nxp.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "S.J. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Mpuaudiosw <Mpuaudiosw@....com>,
        Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>
Cc:     linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        LnxRevLi <LnxRevLi@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor

From: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>

There are cases when we want to test samples that do not
reply with FW READY message, after fw is loaded and the
remote processor started.
In these cases, do not wait for a confirmation from the remote processor
at start.

Added "ignore_dsp_ready" flag while inserting the module to ignore
remote processor reply after start.
By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.

Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>

---
This was discovered while testing openamp_rsc_table sample from Zephyr
repo (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/main/samples/subsys/ipc/openamp_rsc_table).

We have IPC, but the remote proc doesn't send a FW_READY reply.
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index b5634507d953..ed89de2f3b98 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -36,7 +36,13 @@ module_param_named(no_mailboxes, no_mailboxes, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_mailboxes,
 		 "There is no mailbox between cores, so ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
 
+static unsigned int imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready;
+module_param_named(ignore_dsp_ready, imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_dsp_ready,
+		 "Ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
+
 #define REMOTE_IS_READY				BIT(0)
+#define REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY	BIT(1)
 #define REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES		500
 
 /* att flags */
@@ -296,6 +302,12 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_ready(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (!priv->rxdb_ch)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * FW_READY reply is optional/ignored, so don't wait for it.
+	 */
+	if (priv->flags & REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY)
+		return 0;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
 		if (priv->flags & REMOTE_IS_READY)
 			return 0;
@@ -1119,6 +1131,9 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	else
 		imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_init = imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc;
 
+	if (imx_dsp_rproc_ignore_ready)
+		priv->flags |= REMOTE_IGNORE_READY_REPLY;
+
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
 
 	INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_dsp_rproc_vq_work);
-- 
2.17.1