linux-kernel - [PATCH] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: document dtbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230712084131.127982-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 10:41:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        soc@...nel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: document dtbs_check requirement for Samsung

Samsung ARM/ARM64 SoCs (except legacy S5PV210) are also expected not to
bring any new dtbs_check warnings.  In fact this have been already
enforced and tested since few release.

Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

Not sure where to document this. Creating new maintainer profile for
Samsung SoC would be an overkill. OTOH, more SoCs might want to grow
this list, so this also scales poor.
---
 Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst
index 49f08289d62c..12637530d68f 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst
@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ with the dt-bindings that describe the ABI.  Please read the section
 more information on the validation of devicetrees.
 
 For new platforms, or additions to existing ones, ``make dtbs_check`` should not
-add any new warnings.  For RISC-V, as it has the advantage of being a newer
-architecture, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is required to not add any new warnings.
+add any new warnings.  For RISC-V and Samsung SoC, ``make dtbs_check W=1`` is
+required to not add any new warnings.
 If in any doubt about a devicetree change, reach out to the devicetree
 maintainers.
 
-- 
2.34.1