linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/3] bpf, x86: save/restore regs with BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230712084746.833965-2-imagedong@tencent.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 16:47:44 +0800
From:   menglong8.dong@...il.com
To:     yhs@...a.com, daniel@...earbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
        song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
        dsahern@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/3] bpf, x86: save/restore regs with BPF_DW size

From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>

As we already reserve 8 byte in the stack for each reg, it is ok to
store/restore the regs in BPF_DW size. This will make the code in
save_regs()/restore_regs() simpler.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
v6:
- adjust the commit log
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 35 ++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 438adb695daa..fcbd3b7123a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1860,57 +1860,34 @@ st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs,
 		      int stack_size)
 {
-	int i, j, arg_size;
-	bool next_same_struct = false;
+	int i;
 
 	/* Store function arguments to stack.
 	 * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be:
 	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rdi
 	 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],rsi
 	 */
-	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) {
-		/* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */
-		arg_size = m->arg_size[j];
-		if (arg_size > 8) {
-			arg_size = 8;
-			next_same_struct = !next_same_struct;
-		}
-
-		emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
-			 BPF_REG_FP,
+	for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++)
+		emit_stx(prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP,
 			 i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i,
 			 -(stack_size - i * 8));
-
-		j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1;
-	}
 }
 
 static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_regs,
 			 int stack_size)
 {
-	int i, j, arg_size;
-	bool next_same_struct = false;
+	int i;
 
 	/* Restore function arguments from stack.
 	 * For a function that accepts two pointers the sequence will be:
 	 * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x7D, 0xF0); mov rdi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
 	 * EMIT4(0x48, 0x8B, 0x75, 0xF8); mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x8]
 	 */
-	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++) {
-		/* The arg_size is at most 16 bytes, enforced by the verifier. */
-		arg_size = m->arg_size[j];
-		if (arg_size > 8) {
-			arg_size = 8;
-			next_same_struct = !next_same_struct;
-		}
-
-		emit_ldx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(arg_size),
+	for (i = 0; i < min(nr_regs, 6); i++)
+		emit_ldx(prog, BPF_DW,
 			 i == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + i,
 			 BPF_REG_FP,
 			 -(stack_size - i * 8));
-
-		j = next_same_struct ? j : j + 1;
-	}
 }
 
 static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
-- 
2.40.1