| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <fe980d56a21c254c0355c1e5f2a3355a4cc5fe50.1689150149.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 17:27:26 +0800
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
To: w@....eu
Cc: falcon@...ylab.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, thomas@...ch.de
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] tools/nolibc: arch-*.h: add missing space after ','
Fix up such errors reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#148: FILE: tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h:148:
+void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
^
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#148: FILE: tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h:148:
+void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
^
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h | 2 +-
8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h
index e52fa5a20d71..c94fdca9ace6 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
})
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h
index 74773ddcf4ca..5f8bfc24e9c7 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
})
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
index f0d0f5c364b8..915f0e77629e 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
* 2) The deepest stack frame should be set to zero
*
*/
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h
index 9db70d6f2c31..6edec94538e0 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
#endif
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h
index b1c070c5b24a..36d4bf0c6aaa 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
})
/* startup code, note that it's called __start on MIPS */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector __start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector __start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
".set push\n"
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h
index 2e3fcf925ae9..043e2fd85ab0 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
})
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
".option push\n"
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
index 051f3f4ed19b..705576d8fd15 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
})
/* startup code */
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
"lgr %r2, %r15\n" /* save stack pointer to %r2, as arg1 of _start_c */
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h
index 0048adf6b11f..f5614a67f05a 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
* 2) The deepest stack frame should be zero (the %rbp).
*
*/
-void __attribute__((weak,noreturn,optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
+void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_stack_protector _start(void)
{
__asm__ volatile (
#ifdef _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists