linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: SOF: amd: add revision check for sending sha dma completion command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26d859b2-f094-4dfa-9352-b71427755d5f@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:04:12 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Mastan Katragadda <mastan.katragadda@....com>
Cc:     "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
        Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Arungopal.kondaveeti@....com,
        vsujithkumar.reddy@....com, venkataprasad.potturu@....com,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Ajit Kumar Pandey <AjitKumar.Pandey@....com>,
        Ajye Huang <ajye_huang@...pal.corp-partner.google.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOUND OPEN FIRMWARE (SOF) DRIVERS" 
        <sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: SOF: amd: add revision check for
 sending sha dma completion command

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 09:03:30AM +0530, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
> On 03/07/23 21:40, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I don't know off hand what that second patch was.  If it wasn't a bug
> > fix it'll just be waiting till after the merge window.

>  Do I need to resend the second patch?

I still don't know what the patch was - if it's not applied probably.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)