lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOuPNLin6sEp7_KpwzNnvMt-jrsCr2cy2d2aHnr8R7qHX3YLpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 19:32:04 +0530
From:   Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Pintu Kumar <quic_pintu@...cinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: cma: print cma name as well in cma_alloc debug

On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 12:22, Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 20:03, Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 19:52, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 07:46:31PM +0530, Pintu Agarwal wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 19:40, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > > > One more question from here:
> > > > > > pr_debug("%s(cma %p, name: %s, count %lu, align %d)\n", __func__,
> > > > > >                 (void *)cma, cma->name, count, align);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we really need this "cma %p" printing ?
> > > > > > I hardly check it and simply rely on name and count.
> > > > >
> > > > > Printing pointers is almost always a bad idea.  Printing the base_pfn
> > > > > might be a good idea to distinguish CMAs which happen to have the
> > > > > same name?
> > > > >
> > > > No there is no name there, it's just a ptrval
> > > > cma: cma_alloc(cma (ptrval), name: reserved, count 64, align 6)
> > >
> > > You misunderstand me.  I don't know how CMAs get their name.  Is it not
> > > possible for two CMAs to have the same name as each other?
> > >
> > Oh yah that is possible, for example multiple players can use the same
> > global cma region.
>
> Yes, I think it's a good idea to include base_pfn instead of printing pointers.
> Let's complete the cma->name inclusion first.
> Later I will check about base_pfn and push in another patch.
> Thanks

I hope we are good with printing cma->name here ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ