[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <168926009830.3728471.10772472098260314138.b4-ty@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:55:07 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix off by one issue in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail()
On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 16:04:03 +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> In ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(), we want the start order to be
> 1 less than goal length and the min_order to be, at max, 1 more than the
> original length. This commit fixes an off by one issue that arose due to
> the fact that 1 << fls(n) > (n).
>
> After all the processing:
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] ext4: fix off by one issue in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail()
commit: 7c79210b15ef69a5702d1fb817bad9a30bffb097
Best regards,
--
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists