[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b231ae46-b885-4351-25d5-150c5fa3d6db@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 10:26:01 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, andres@...razel.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] io_uring: add support for vectored futex waits
On 7/13/23 5:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:20:17AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> int io_futex_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>> +int io_futexv_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
>> int io_futex_wait(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>> +int io_futex_waitv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>> int io_futex_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
>
> That's an inconsistent naming convention.. I'll stare at the rest later.
I had to stare at that a bit.. Yes it is, I'll unify that.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists