linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add back FORTIFY_SOURCE logic to kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202307130953.B54C43B@keescook>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:53:20 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add back FORTIFY_SOURCE logic to kernel_stack
 event structure

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 09:26:05AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> For backward compatibility, older tooling expects to see the kernel_stack
> event with a "caller" field that is a fixed size array of 8 addresses. The
> code now supports more than 8 with an added "size" field that states the
> real number of entries. But the "caller" field still just looks like a
> fixed size to user space.
> 
> Since the tracing macros that create the user space format files also
> creates the structures that those files represent, the kernel_stack event
> structure had its "caller" field a fixed size of 8, but in reality, when
> it is allocated on the ring buffer, it can hold more if the stack trace is
> bigger that 8 functions. The copying of these entries was simply done with
> a memcpy():
> 
>   size = nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long);
>   memcpy(entry->caller, fstack->calls, size);
> 
> The FORTIFY_SOURCE logic noticed at runtime that when the nr_entries was
> larger than 8, that the memcpy() was writing more than what the structure
> stated it can hold and it complained about it. This is because the
> FORTIFY_SOURCE code is unaware that the amount allocated is actually
> enough to hold the size. It does not expect that a fixed size field will
> hold more than the fixed size.
> 
> This was originally solved by hiding the caller assignment with some
> pointer arithmetic.
> 
>   ptr = ring_buffer_data();
>   entry = ptr;
> 
>   ptr += offsetof(typeof(*entry), caller);
>   memcpy(ptr, fstack->calls, size);
> 
> But it is considered bad form to hide from kernel hardening. Instead, make
> it work nicely with FORTIFY_SOURCE by adding a new __stack_array() macro
> that is specific for this one special use case. The macro will take 4
> arguments: type, item, len, field (whereas the __array() macro takes just
> the first three). This macro will act just like the __array() macro when
> creating the code to deal with the format file that is exposed to user
> space. But for the kernel, it will turn the caller field into:
> 
>   type item[] __counted_by(field);
> 
> or for this instance:
> 
>   unsigned long caller[] __counted_by(size);
> 
> Now the kernel code can expose the assignment of the caller to the
> FORTIFY_SOURCE and everyone is happy!
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230712105235.5fc441aa@gandalf.local.home/
> 
> Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Yay! This looks good. :)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook