[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49fs5r7hj1.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:12:02 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mm: use memmap_on_memory semantics for dax/kmem
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
> On 16.06.23 00:00, Vishal Verma wrote:
>> The dax/kmem driver can potentially hot-add large amounts of memory
>> originating from CXL memory expanders, or NVDIMMs, or other 'device
>> memories'. There is a chance there isn't enough regular system memory
>> available to fit ythe memmap for this new memory. It's therefore
>> desirable, if all other conditions are met, for the kmem managed memory
>> to place its memmap on the newly added memory itself.
>>
>> Arrange for this by first allowing for a module parameter override for
>> the mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory() test using a flag, adjusting the
>> only other caller of this interface in dirvers/acpi/acpi_memoryhotplug.c,
>> exporting the symbol so it can be called by kmem.c, and finally changing
>> the kmem driver to add_memory() in chunks of memory_block_size_bytes().
>
> 1) Why is the override a requirement here? Just let the admin
> configure it then then add conditional support for kmem.
>
> 2) I recall that there are cases where we don't want the memmap to
> land on slow memory (which online_movable would achieve). Just imagine
> the slow PMEM case. So this might need another configuration knob on
> the kmem side.
>From my memory, the case where you don't want the memmap to land on
*persistent memory* is when the device is small (such as NVDIMM-N), and
you want to reserve as much space as possible for the application data.
This has nothing to do with the speed of access.
-Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists