[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b374e37-68b3-346a-a6b7-212640e9c868@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 22:01:33 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, Qingfang DENG <qingfang.deng@...lower.com.cn>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Ville Nuorvala <vnuorval@....hut.fi>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.4 0/6] 6.4.3-rc2 review
On 7/12/23 12:02 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:41:46 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> That is the commit id from stable-rc tree.
>>
>> I have re-tested the reported issues multiple times and
>> it seems that it is intermittently reproducible.
>> Following list of links shows kernel crashes while testing
>> selftest net pmtu.sh
>>
>> 1)
>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6579624#L4648
>>
>>
>> 2)
>> include/net/neighbour.h:302 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>>
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6579625#L7500
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6579626#L7509
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6579622#L7537
>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6579623#L7469
>
> Nothing jumps out at me.
>
> David, any ideas?
No. Since it is a selftest in the linux repo, any chance for a git
bisect based on that one test?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists